The practice has often developed evidence to assist them in their tasks and to improve consistency in the coordination of care (see Table 1 for common voucher frequencies). See for more details. Master`s and co-management agreements have faced unique implementation challenges. In the case of broader agreements on master services, the parties have sometimes found it difficult to maintain a consensus on «adequate» follow-up, availability and costs of services to patients or insurers. Practices were sometimes surprised to know to what extent their values were truly shared, not only among their CCA employees, but in their own practices. In one case, a PCP champion, who had negotiated a rigorous agreement with specialized firms, regretted that some of her own colleagues had proved to be obstacles in the implementation process: they were not interested in common care and certain responsibilities delegated exclusively to specialists. Author data: The authors (EC, MKD, HHP) do not report any relationship or financial interest with an entity that would constitute a conflict of interest with the purpose of this article. This document is based on work done prior to Dr. Pham`s entry into the Medicare-Medicaid Services Centers and does not reflect the policies or programs of CMS or the Department of Health and Human Services. Care coordination agreements are effective tools for presenting the responsibilities of participating providers, facilities and services. These agreements ensure that responsibilities for transfers of care and services are orderly and promote the highest possible quality of care. The agreements also include protocols and procedures for sharing information between organizations.
Clarification of existing federal laws governing cooperation between independent practices, including concerns that their agreement could be interpreted as a kick or self-referral, can help reassure suppliers. Again, we did not find examples of suppliers with legal problems, but we have seen several cases where suppliers were reluctant to enter into agreements because they feared they would violate those laws. In the case of care transitions, some follow-up and follow-up are necessary and must be documented. Physicians face major challenges in coordinating care. Patients (especially chronically ill patients) often see many providers; 1 The study showed that the typical Medicare receptor sees 7 different physicians in 4 different practices for one year.1 Poor coordination can lead patients to receive conflicting advice from different providers (including conflicting drug prescriptions) and there is no follow-up for new diagnoses, tests or procedures that pose risks to patient health.2 The burden of coordinating care may be high especially for providers. (PC). 3 Elements describing the joint management of specific conditions were found in about half of the agreements we audited and were described as a useful feature by all respondents who had developed them. For example, a co-management agreement between a PCP and a pharmacist provides that the pharmacist can order certain tests for medically licensed diabetics and adapt the drugs according to an agreed protocol based on the test results. One of the cornerstones of effective coordination of care is the rapid exchange of patient information, which helps multiple providers access information services and document the progress of the care plan. These include demographic and care information contained in the CCBHCs electronic medical record, as well as medical and benefit records from other providers involved in coordinated care.
- Posted by wbase
- On 15 abril, 2021
- 0 Comments