Work Package Agreement Template

——— question: «3rd term. As an alternative to a long-standing date, you can add a definite result that refers to the progress of the order of work or the work statement. Answer: The terms of the program expire when the delivery elements of the work package are provided and signed by the SKA organization. [MoU]. ——— question: «6. Dismissal. 6.2. Why do we need the approval of the SKA organization to terminate a member? Answer: Paragraph 6.2 refers to the termination of the contract in its entirety and not only to the termination of a particular member`s participation. The successful delivery of work packages requires that consortia are not free to unilaterally end their delivery obligations. Article 6.1 concerns the cessation of the participation of a single member.

Since all members of the consortium are considered by the SKA organization to be an important role in the successful implementation of the work package, SKA`s agreement must be obtained before members terminate another member`s contractual obligations. [CA]. The following agreements now refer to SKA`s work packages: ——— question: «1. Definitions. Work package Consortium leader: needs to be clarified. In clause 7.1, add the person appointed by the Lead Organisation Consortium. Answer: Consortium members are free to define and/or clarify issues they deem appropriate for their certification body. [CA]. Work packages are a way for the project manager to group work activities and assign work to a team or team leader to create one or more products. A work package is therefore a set of information on one or more products required. A work package may contain a description of the work package, product descriptions, techniques to use, tolerances, date of agreement between PM and TM, as the TM reports to the PM, and quality information.

——— question: «Given that the consortium`s discussions are seriously planned, we would be pleased to see clearly how the SKA plans to formally allocate the pre-construction work and ensure delivery within the volume limit.» Answer: For each work package, the SKA organisation will hold a Memorandum of Understanding with the members of the consortium responsible for the supply of this work package. The results indicated in the working statement on this file will present the results achieved under the program. [MoU]. ——— question: «1. Definitions. The definition of SKA participants refers to an agreement to which the SKAO belongs. This could be an agreement between the SKAO and the Lead Institute Consortium, not a proposed consortium agreement in its current form. Answer: The definition of the SKA contributor would apply to a lead consortium organization under an agreement to which it and the SKA organization were the only parties. However, the SKA organization requires all consortium members to sign up for a certification body so that the definition of the SKA contributor also applies to them. The SKA organization`s IP policy is included as a calendar in the protocol. Initially, it was intended that the strategy document would be submitted to the SKA Board of Directors for approval and then made available to the recipients of the RFP call, which is recommended with the intention of responding to it. Since the publication of the draft IP directive as part of the RfP documentation package, it has been subject to various inputs and, once all the proposals in the work package have been received, it would now be planned to make the most recent version of the document available to each contact person in the proposed consortium.

A page will be created on SKA`s website to obtain and respond to information on the draft IP directive. These feedbacks will be accepted until June 28, 2013; At its Board meeting on July 24-25, 2013, the SKA Board of Directors is invited to approve SKA`s IP policy. ——— question: «Schedule 2 – Operational Procedures.